Grace Schara Legal updates, Oct. 2, 2023

Landmark lawsuit

IMPORTANT Court Hearing Update

Thank you all for signing up for Updates! We will be updating you here through this email platform as Grace’s story and legal case progresses.

For those of you who have been following our case, thank you for walking alongside us and for all your love and support!

Last week we told you we were working on the scheduling of the next hearing.  It will be at 2:15 p.m. on Monday, October 30th.

This hearing is even more important than the last one.  There are two Partial Motions to Dismiss motivating this next step.  We’ve previously explained the details in our email update last week, so won’t do so again.

That being said, we continue to push forward with our public message and appreciate all of your support.  We’re asking for your help, once again.

Our family is planning on being to the courthouse at 1:30 p.m. to greet supporters and pray before entering the facility.  We encourage you to bring signs, but do not bring them into the courthouse. It will be critically important to pack the courtroom like we did with the first hearing!

More info below:

Location:

320 S. Walnut Street

Appleton, WI 54911

Branch 1, Government Center Courtroom 1 (same courtroom as our previous hearing)

By way of background, the July 14th hearing resulted in the judge scheduling the trial and requesting we file an Amended Complaint.  Our amendment was filed on July 28th.  Subsequently, two additional Partial Motions to Dismiss were filed by defense attorneys.  The judge has now scheduled a hearing on these motions for 2:15 p.m. on October 30th.

We are hopeful that all of our claims (especially the illegal DNR and battery) are allowed for the trial.  If there’s going to be justice (for Grace and 1.2M others), through man’s legal system, the entire case must be heard at the trial – please pray for this issue.  Our Brief in Opposition spells out the reasons these claims must continue and must be separated from medical malpractice.

Based on the experience with the July 14th hearing, the legal team has asked us to communicate the importance of complete silence during the hearing for those attending (including cellphones off).

Also, per Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules, audio and video recording is not allowed inside any Wisconsin Courtroom.  The media may be allowed to record but must make an advance request in writing for media access to the Clerk of Courts.

Some comments from Scott:

The essence of the defenses’ motions is similar to the first go around.  They want to make this case about malpractice, in order to limit liability.  The defense also wants the judge to dismiss our request for declaratory judgment regarding the illegal DNR order.  This case is much larger than malpractice.  It is about a battery, leading to malpractice, which led to Grace’s wrongful death.  Therefore, the basis of their motion isn’t valid.  It is secondly about protecting the public from doctors unilaterally placing Do Not Resuscitate orders on patients.  The doctor’s regulatory agency in Wisconsin, the Department of Safety and Professional Services, wrote on December 5, 2022, that the Wisconsin DNR statute “does not apply to physicians operating in a hospital, non-emergency room setting such as the one in question.”

Interestingly, the defense isn’t bashful about their motive.  In their first Motion to Partially Dismiss, they write, “The Legislature’s purpose in enacting a statutory scheme to govern claims for damages arising out of alleged medical negligence was to encourage health care providers to remain in Wisconsin by imposing certain limits on the causes of action that a patient or her family member can pursue, and on the types and amount of damages that can be recovered.”  FYI, the word ‘scheme’ fits like a glove.

Think about this statement of motive – ‘we need to limit liability for doctors, or they won’t come to our State’ is the basis for a law targeting the citizens impacted by medical malfeasance.  Do good doctors need liability protection?  Why do small business owners not receive the same protections?  Because it is wrong for the government to take away consequences.  This game has been implemented by the “health care” lobby to facilitate the culture of death.  How has The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, eliminating liability for vaccine manufacturers, worked out?  Ask someone with autism if you are wondering.  How about someone who died suddenly of the newly invented Sudden Adult Death Syndrome, as the result of taking the “vaccine” that was going to be our savior?  God’s economy has consequences for choices.  When consequences are removed, by law, the effects are catastrophic.

Thanks for following our story!

---

Please mark your calendars and join us for a Celebration to Remember!

---

What Can You Do?

Have everyone you know sign up for updates at GraceSchara.com and share Grace’s story. Please visit OurAmazingGrace.net to learn more about Grace.