Landmark Medical Jury Trial in Appleton, Wisconsin Approved for Livestream
‘The New American’ and ‘Children’s Health Defense’ to Broadcast Livestream
In the upcoming landmark trial, Schara v. Ascension Health, et al (Case No. 2023CV000345), Circuit Court Judge Mark McGinnis ruled last week that the trial can be livestreamed for public consumption from the Overflow Courtroom, while no computers, cameras, or recording devices will be allowed inside the courtroom itself. This order provides an opportunity for interested parties to follow the trial for its expected three-week run.
If you are attending the trial, it is critical that you read and abide by the entire Court Order. Please read it carefully. The complete Order is in the below PDF:
What:
The case seeks justice for Grace Schara, a 19-year-old with Down syndrome, whose death on October 13, 2021, her family alleges would have been avoided with proper medical care. Ascension, et al claims no wrongdoing.
When:
June 2, 2025, is the first day of the trial, beginning with jury selection.
The trial is expected to last three weeks.
Where:
Outagamie County Courthouse, 320 S. Walnut Street, Appleton, WI 54911. The trial is open to the public. There will be a morning (8:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.) and afternoon session (1:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.) each day. You do not need to sign up to attend.
The nonprofit organization, ‘Children’s Health Defense,’ in conjunction with ‘The New American,’ will livestream the entire trial. Viewers can tune in on their website at: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/
Who:
Plaintiffs: Scott Schara and the Estate of Grace Schara
Defendants: Ascension Health, St. Elizabeth’s Hospital, and individual medical staff members.
Why:
The trial will examine allegations of negligence, lack of informed consent, and medical battery. The plaintiff also seeks a declaratory judgment for the DNR order and medication combination that the plaintiff alleges resulted in his daughter’s death.
This is amazing! I wish other news outlets would pick it up.
If they, who as judge or jury, expect any hope of survival, they must include another question: "was this an act of aggression against people with weakened immune systems (due to age and, or genetic predisposition to vulnerability)?", because this act of aggression thirsting for retribution actually happened and continues to this day. You should never miss the reason why this happened in the first place, it was poisoning, not a virus, and who started it, allowed it to happen and who created this weapon of genocide.